ADBE

ADBE

Investings In Shadow Dividend Stocks

eChristian Investing submits:Stories about the bleak housing market have filled the news headlines for the past three years. It’s almost hard to remember back to the heydays of 2005-2006 when real estate was the hottest investment since internet IPOs. Unfortunately now all we hear is bad news and many don’t expect a recovery for several more years. One of the factors holding back a recovery in the housing markets is the tremendous “shadow inventory”. Shadow inventory in the housing market refers to the number of homeowners that would like to list their house for sale, but market conditions, financial circumstances or a host of other reasons keep them from doing so. These homes are not included in the current inventory of available homes for sale, but it is understood that this “shadow inventory” represents a large number of homes that will come onto the market if certain circumstances are met. In the world of dividend investing, there is a similar parallel with what we affectionately refer to as “shadow dividend stocks”. These companies currently do not pay a dividend to investors, but they have all the criteria to make a great dividend stock. These companies generate significant free cash flow, impeccable balance sheets with growing cash balances and consistent earnings growth. All of which are fundamental criteria that a good dividend investor looks for when evaluating a stock. The only thing that seems to be missing is the actual dividend. For investors who need current income, this is obviously a major issue. However, many investors look to dividend stocks not just for the income, but because these stocks have consistently outperformed the overall market returns. These companies have strong cash flows and a high degree of confidence in future cash flows to consistently pay and even increase their dividend payments. Investing in stocks that meet these criteria, but don’t yet pay a dividend is an intriguing option to these investors. Apple (AAPL) is prime example of a shadow dividend stock. The company generated $4 billion in cash last quarter and has over $24 billion in cash. The company has been consistently growing their earnings and few doubt their ability to continue to do so given their strong product pipeline. The only problem is that Apple doesn’t pay a dividend. They’ve also given no indication that they will do so in the foreseeable future, despite the fact that Apple CEO Steve Jobs makes a living off dividend income. However, for long-term investors that don’t need immediate income, Apple represents the type of cash cow that you love to have in your portfolio. Even if Apple paid out only 50% of their current cash flows, this shadow dividend stock would yield 3-4%. Cisco Systems (CSCO), Google (GOOG) and to a lesser extent Adobe Systems (ADBE) all fit into this category. Shadow dividend stocks aren’t restricted to the technology sector either: Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) has generated $87 million in free cash flow in the first half of 2010 despite opening 45 new stores this year. Big Lots (BIG) expects to generate $220 million in cash flow this year. Celgene (CELG) has over $3 billion in cash on their balance sheet and that has grown nearly $120 million since the beginning of the year. While Family Dollar Stores (FDO) is a dividend aristocrat that has increased their dividend for 34 consecutive years, competitor 99¢ Stores (NDN)pays no dividend despite generating $75 million in operating cash flow last quarter. These stocks are all attractive because of their ability to generate strong, future cash flows. Even if they don’t currently pay a dividend, these shadow dividend stocks have the potential to reward investors in the future.Disclosure: Long AAPLComplete Story »

Nasdaq 100 Stocks Within 10% of Their 52-Week Low

Dividend Inc. submits:
Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 10% of the 52-week low. Although the stock price is low on a relative basis, we're still on the lookout for a retest of the March 2009 lows. This could mean that many of these stocks could have much further to go on the downside.Sym.NamePriceP/EEPSYieldP/B% to LowGILDGilead Sciences$31.9410.24$3.120.00%4.290.35%NVDANVIDIA$10.0520.85$0.480.00%2.141.52%XRAYDENTSPLY$29.2515.99$1.830.70%2.461.77%FISVFiserv, Inc.$45.6014.29$3.190.00%2.311.79%SPLSStaples, Inc.$19.3117.86$1.081.80%2.182.60%PAYXPaychex, Inc.$25.6719.46$1.324.70%6.833.13%AMGNAmgen Inc.$52.1711.07$4.710.00%2.293.68%VRTXVertex Pharma.$32.470-$3.500.00%6.893.90%ERTSElectronic Arts Inc.$14.790-$2.080.00%1.875.19%ADBEAdobe Systems$27.3938.47$0.710.00%2.865.31%FWLTFoster Wheeler$21.527.85$2.740.00%3.285.85%AMATApplied Materials$12.1938.09$0.322.20%2.296.18%HOLXHologic, Inc.$14.1225.67$0.550.00%1.356.49%CACA Inc.$19.0012.9$1.470.80%1.996.74%SHLDSears Holding$63.2332.69$1.930.00%0.876.79%SYMCSymantec$14.5916.73$0.870.00%2.627.44%YHOOYahoo! Inc.$14.9026.75$0.560.00%1.678.36%GOOGGoogle Inc.$459.6120.92$21.970.00%4.118.53%LOGILogitech Intl$14.330$0.000.00%08.81%MSFTMicrosoft$24.8912.9$1.932.00%4.899.50%KLACKLA-Tencor$29.2368.45$0.432.00%2.349.52%EBAYeBay Inc.$20.0910.87$1.850.00%1.959.72%APOLApollo Group$45.5711.68$3.900.00%4.779.94% Watch List NotesComplete Story »

Taking a Closer Look at Adobe's Financials

Kapitall submits:Adobe (ADBE) is due to report earnings on after the market close on June 22. Here is a closer look at the company's most recent financials.The stock has performed poorly over the last year: Adobe's stock has gained 15.16% over the last year, lagging the S&P 500 index, which gained roughly 20% during that time. The stock is currently trading in the middle of its 52-week range.Complete Story »

On Steve Jobs’ Comments at the D8 All Things Digital Conference

Edward Harrison submits:In the links yesterday morning I highlighted the D8 All Things Digital technology conference hosted by Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg. Apple (AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs was there sounding off on all manner of topics from Google (GOOG) to Adobe (ADBE) to the iPad. The Wall Street Journal has the video now. So I am re-posting it here. Boy does Jobs look weak and thin. Compare him then to the picture from the 1970s I posted in the links. One note: Jobs talks about not wanting America to "descend into a nation of bloggers," criticizing blogs and the lack of editorial review. Jobs says he’s all for "anything we can do to help the New York Times, The Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal" gather news and disseminate it.Complete Story »

The Proles Are Waking Up Jobs

Karl Denninger submits: That's Steve Jobs, not "jobs" as in what you go to in the morning: In Stogdill's telling analogy, you "aren't buying a computer when you buy an iPad, you are buying a 16GB Walmart store shelf that fits on your lap — complete with all the supplier beat downs, slotting fees, and exclusive deals that go with it—and Apple got you to pay for the building."Complete Story »

Apple's Moves Into Anti-Competition

cheep-talk submits: By Jeffrey ElyWhen you are competing to be the dominant platform, compatibility is an important strategic variable. Generally if you are the upstart you want your platform to be compatible with the established one. This lowers users’ costs of trying yours out. Then of course when you become established, you want to keep your platform incompatible with any upstart.Complete Story »

Why Microsoft and Oracle Are Safer Long-Term Bets Than Google and SAP

Naveen Selvaraj submits:I believe that software/Internet stocks, with at least two profitable and long-standing businesses, will outperform the businesses deriving the majority of their profits from a single line of business over the next business cycle (2010-2013).Hence, Microsoft (MSFT), with two successful business lines in productivity and system software, will outperform a company like Google (GOOG), which derives most of its profits (I want to stress profits and not just revenues) from the search business.Complete Story »

iPad's Lack of Flash Is Not Due to Any "Shortcomings" With Flash, Blames Apple

Dan Rayburn submits: In my post entitled "Many Content Owners Can't Afford To Make Their Videos Available For iPad", many readers left comments making it clear that they blame Adobe (ADBE) for the lack of Flash video support on the iPad. Too many simply want to disregard the additional costs a content owner has to support the iPad by blaming supposed shortcomings in Flash, even though we've seen data from tests to show that these shortcomings do not exist. Reading many of the comments on my post it's clear that some just want an excuse to bash Flash, yet if my content was in Silverlight, I don't think they would be saying the same thing. If someone does not like Flash, that's fine, they have every right to. But their dislike for a platform gives them no grounds to stand on to say that there are no additional costs to content owners to support video on the iPad.Complete Story »

Syndicate content